
OUTCOME OF ETHYLOESTRENOL REVIEW
Greyhounds Australasia (GA) advises that it has conducted its review of the racing rule, which allows oral
administration of ethyloestrenol for the female racing greyhound, on the basis that it is prescribed by a
registered veterinarian, for the sole purpose of regulating or preventing oestrus.
The GA Board acknowledges and thanks industry participants, veterinarians, racing analysts and a like, that
took the time to provide a submission to the review.
After taking account all of the information that had been received and assessing this against the terms of
reference, the GA Board RESOLVED at its 12 March 2010 Board meeting that:
The Board highlights that this decision was based on the following:
Mr Russell Ware, GA Chairman said:
“The decision of the Board regarding ethyloestrenol was an extremely difficult one.”
“Views on the subject are divided and judgment differs between participants and experts. This was highlighted
in the questionnaires and independent opinion received where 10 alternative oestrus suppression products
were recommended. Australasia is not alone with this dilemma as Britain is facing a similar problem.”
In making its determination, the GA Board acknowledged and agreed that:
For any inquiries please contact.
CRAIG TABERNER
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PH: 03 9548 3500
About Greyhounds Australasia (GA)
Greyhounds Australasia (GA) comprises representatives from jurisdictional controlling bodies in Australian
States and Territories and New Zealand (the GA Directors).
The charter of GA is to support these jurisdictions via encouragement of a holistic approach to the
Australasian greyhound racing industry creating uniformity with the brand.
GA provides its stakeholders with value-added services and industry practices that support industry integrity,
maximize returns and ensures a sustainable future.
By virtue of the state/federal political system, individual jurisdictional controlling bodies control the regulation
and governance of racing, clubs and the functions and commercial activities of greyhound racing under a local
Racing Act of Parliament or like legislation.
Thus while all jurisdictions are represented on the GA Board, in general, the ultimate determination to either
accept or reject a GA recommendation is a decision for the individual jurisdiction. An exception occurs when a
GA Board resolution is passed by a certain majority as a “Compulsive Resolution”, in which case the resolution
is binding on all GA member bodies.